Triple

T32805547
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Forellenquintett E839010 entity
Predicate hasOpusOrCatalogueNumber P66233 FINISHED
Object D. 667 NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: D. 667 | Statement: [Forellenquintett, hasOpusOrCatalogueNumber, D. 667]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOpusOrCatalogueNumber
Context triple: [Forellenquintett, hasOpusOrCatalogueNumber, D. 667]
  • A. hasOpusNumber chosen
    Indicates that a musical work is associated with a specific opus number assigned to it, typically denoting its place in a composer’s catalog.
  • B. hasOpusForm
    Indicates that an entity (such as a work or composition) is associated with a specific opus form or cataloging format.
  • C. cataloguedWithOpera
    Indicates that an item is recorded or documented in association with a specific opera work or opera-related cataloging system.
  • D. recordLabelCatalogNumber
    Indicates the catalog or identification number assigned to a release by a record label.
  • E. isDiscographyOf
    Indicates that one entity is the complete collection of recorded works (discography) belonging to another entity, typically an artist or band.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3493d35208190b4351b4e85f2fa16 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7c777e924819081a6634f549fe552 completed May 3, 2026, 10:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c475c58c8190a883554231e88c88 completed May 3, 2026, 9:56 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:15 a.m.