Triple

T32803501
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Art Forum E838959 entity
Predicate hasArtisticDirectionBy P93826 FINISHED
Object Greg Osby NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Greg Osby | Statement: [Art Forum, hasArtisticDirectionBy, Greg Osby]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasArtisticDirectionBy
Context triple: [Art Forum, hasArtisticDirectionBy, Greg Osby]
  • A. hasArtDirection
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for or associated with the artistic direction or visual style of another entity.
  • B. artisticDirection chosen
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for guiding and overseeing the creative or aesthetic vision of another entity or project.
  • C. artisticDirectionTraditionallyHeldBy
    Indicates that the role of artistic direction for something has customarily or historically been carried out by a particular person, group, or type of entity.
  • D. artDirectionBy
    Indicates that the visual and stylistic design of a work is overseen or created by a specified art director.
  • E. hasArtisticFocus
    Indicates that an entity’s primary artistic attention, theme, or specialization is directed toward a particular subject, style, or medium.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3493d35208190b4351b4e85f2fa16 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd68abf52881909c5a390c362b7c59 completed May 8, 2026, 4:38 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd6812d0c88190930d8fa2d4b92490 completed May 8, 2026, 4:35 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:15 a.m.