Triple
T3280031
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Socratic family |
E68849
|
entity |
| Predicate | childOfHead |
P33614
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Menexenus (son of Socrates) |
E12793
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Menexenus (son of Socrates) | Statement: [Socratic family, childOfHead, Menexenus (son of Socrates)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Menexenus (son of Socrates) Context triple: [Socratic family, childOfHead, Menexenus (son of Socrates)]
-
A.
Menexenus (son)
chosen
Menexenus (son) is known in ancient Greek tradition as a son of the philosopher Socrates.
-
B.
Sophroniscus (son of Socrates)
Sophroniscus was one of the sons of the Athenian philosopher Socrates and his wife Xanthippe.
-
C.
Philocrates
Philocrates is the purported recipient and addressee of the ancient Jewish-Hellenistic work known as the Letter of Aristeas.
-
D.
Cebes of Thebes
Cebes of Thebes was an ancient Greek philosopher, a disciple of Socrates, and a prominent interlocutor in Plato’s dialogue "Phaedo."
-
E.
Echecrates
Echecrates is a Pythagorean philosopher who appears in Plato’s dialogue "Phaedo" as the interlocutor to whom Phaedo recounts the final conversation and death of Socrates.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad859c463481909ca4be267336c290 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb0166c8c81909cb0a580ef319be3 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b324fec6d88190a8ecb6f9a3429b2e |
completed | March 12, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:10 p.m.