Triple
T32774956
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reply-To |
E838173
|
entity |
| Predicate | isProcessedBy |
P175512
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mail user agent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mail user agent | Statement: [Reply-To, isProcessedBy, mail user agent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isProcessedBy Context triple: [Reply-To, isProcessedBy, mail user agent]
-
A.
requiresProcessingBy
Indicates that one entity must undergo handling, treatment, or transformation performed by another entity before a condition is met or a process can continue.
-
B.
introducedByProcessor
Indicates that something was created, added, or brought into a system as a result of actions performed by a specific processor.
-
C.
isKeyProcessIn
Indicates that a process plays a central or essential role within a larger system, workflow, or operation.
-
D.
isWetProcessed
Indicates that an entity has undergone a wet (water-based) processing method rather than a dry or alternative processing method.
-
E.
applicationProcessedBy
Indicates that an application has been handled or dealt with by a particular agent or system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493a824c8190938489ba69041d08 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d210fc80819091ed8961aa2cddfb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cfe45554819089cbbd538d992132 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6d16b79dc8190ab0d4657f2ef9a5b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:13 a.m.