Triple
T32774542
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Estonia |
E838158
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMajorPortOn |
P942
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gulf of Finland |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gulf of Finland | Statement: [Estonia, hasMajorPortOn, Gulf of Finland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMajorPortOn Context triple: [Estonia, hasMajorPortOn, Gulf of Finland]
-
A.
hasMajorPort
chosen
Indicates that a location possesses a primary, significant seaport used for major commercial or transportation activities.
-
B.
hasMajorPortFunction
Indicates that an entity serves as a primary port facility, playing a significant role in maritime transport, trade, or logistics operations.
-
C.
hasPortOn
Indicates that one entity possesses or is located adjacent to a port situated on another specified geographic or infrastructural feature (such as a coast, river, or lake).
-
D.
hasPorts
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or provides access points (ports) for connection, communication, or interface with other entities or systems.
-
E.
hasPortConnection
Indicates that one entity is linked to another via a port or interface through which data, power, or signals can be transmitted.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493a824c8190938489ba69041d08 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00ac5654a0819090701f61a5802d64 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00ab94b5e881909e15d1342e5f43be |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:13 a.m.