Triple
T32771800
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Court of Session Inner House |
E838083
|
entity |
| Predicate | isSupremeCourtFor |
P6120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | civil appeals in Scotland |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: civil appeals in Scotland | Statement: [Court of Session Inner House, isSupremeCourtFor, civil appeals in Scotland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isSupremeCourtFor Context triple: [Court of Session Inner House, isSupremeCourtFor, civil appeals in Scotland]
-
A.
supremeCourtOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the highest judicial authority (supreme court) within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
B.
isMajorCourtIn
Indicates that a court is a primary or high-level judicial body within the specified jurisdiction or region.
-
C.
highestCourtOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
D.
governingJurisdictionSupreme
Indicates that one jurisdiction holds ultimate legal authority or highest governing power over another jurisdiction or domain.
-
E.
isCourtOfRecord
Indicates that a particular court maintains a permanent, authoritative record of its proceedings and has the power to fine or imprison for contempt.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493a824c8190938489ba69041d08 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6ce6d659881909ddcec1d2966e020 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cc1667a48190b42684f6ec22dae9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:13 a.m.