Triple

T3277170
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Collège Bourbon E68784 entity
Predicate historicalNameType P47064 FINISHED
Object collège LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: collège | Statement: [Collège Bourbon, historicalNameType, collège]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalNameType
Context triple: [Collège Bourbon, historicalNameType, collège]
  • A. regionHistoricalName
    Indicates that a region has been known by a particular historical name during some past period.
  • B. historicallyRecognizedAs
    Indicates that an entity has been acknowledged or designated under a particular name, status, or role during a past historical period.
  • C. historicallyBorneBy
    Indicates that an entity has carried, possessed, or used another entity (such as a name, title, or symbol) at some point in the past.
  • D. historicalForm
    Indicates that one entity is an earlier or historically attested form or variant of another entity.
  • E. hasTraditionalName
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a name traditionally used or recognized for it, often rooted in long-standing cultural or historical practice.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad859b54f881909bf530d549caf2fd completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb0128f08819084644f3c8fda2596 completed March 8, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ada420167c81909b6e2702db296d9e completed March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ada525bb2c8190b773efe6d696b6ab completed March 8, 2026, 4:34 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:10 p.m.