Triple
T32766392
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SP5 (civilian variant) |
E837912
|
entity |
| Predicate | designedToRetain |
P196911
|
FINISHED |
| Object | MP5 ergonomics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: MP5 ergonomics | Statement: [SP5 (civilian variant), designedToRetain, MP5 ergonomics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designedToRetain Context triple: [SP5 (civilian variant), designedToRetain, MP5 ergonomics]
-
A.
proposedToRetain
Indicates that one entity has suggested or decided to keep or continue maintaining another entity in its current role, state, or possession.
-
B.
canRetain
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to keep, hold, or maintain possession or control of another entity over time.
-
C.
retained
Indicates that one entity keeps possession, control, or continued engagement of another entity over a period of time.
-
D.
mustRetain
Indicates that an entity is required to keep or preserve another entity and is not allowed to discard, delete, or release it.
-
E.
designedToReplicate
Indicates that one entity is intentionally created or configured to imitate, reproduce, or copy the form, function, or behavior of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34939857c8190aa9970c51feec1eb |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe6e492bf8819080b25221d13445ea |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe6dd33a6881908fe9bbbc184cab51 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:12 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fe6e4801108190a6be6bec2d52a1b9 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:14 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:13 a.m.