Triple
T32760551
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Custer Expedition of 1874 |
E837741
|
entity |
| Predicate | violatedTreaty |
P16464
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) | Statement: [Custer Expedition of 1874, violatedTreaty, Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: violatedTreaty Context triple: [Custer Expedition of 1874, violatedTreaty, Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868)]
-
A.
brokeTreatyWith
chosen
Indicates that one party violated the terms of a formal agreement or treaty it had with another party.
-
B.
treaty
Indicates a formal, negotiated agreement or pact established between entities, typically states or organizations, that defines mutual obligations, rights, or terms of cooperation.
-
C.
treatyOf
Indicates a formal agreement or pact established between entities, typically states or organizations, defining their mutual obligations or terms.
-
D.
treatyAfter
Indicates that a treaty or formal agreement was established after a specified prior event, condition, or relationship between the entities.
-
E.
followedTreaty
Indicates that one party complied with and acted in accordance with the terms of a specified treaty in relation to another party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34939857c8190aa9970c51feec1eb |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6ce6d659881909ddcec1d2966e020 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cc1667a48190b42684f6ec22dae9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:13 a.m.