Triple

T32757840
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject San Diego Chargers (assistant coach) E837674 entity
Predicate employerPredecessorName P181274 FINISHED
Object Los Angeles Chargers NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Los Angeles Chargers | Statement: [San Diego Chargers (assistant coach), employerPredecessorName, Los Angeles Chargers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: employerPredecessorName
Context triple: [San Diego Chargers (assistant coach), employerPredecessorName, Los Angeles Chargers]
  • A. predecessorCompany
    Indicates that one company previously existed in a role or form that was succeeded or replaced by another company.
  • B. formerEmployer
    Indicates that one entity previously employed the other but no longer does so.
  • C. underlyingCompanyPredecessor
    Indicates that one company served as a predecessor entity to another company in an underlying or foundational corporate relationship.
  • D. predecessorCEO
    Indicates that one person previously held the position of CEO before another specific person.
  • E. predecessorName
    Indicates that the value is the name of an entity that directly precedes another in an ordered sequence or lineage.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34937f97c8190b7f84bea045df3ae completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7675b12848190a3569cfda29c5b0e completed May 3, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f762f4b59481909f70074f11825bfb completed May 3, 2026, 3 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f76759b3c48190ad8f1b33596f98c4 completed May 3, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:13 a.m.