Triple
T3275684
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Guna language |
E68751
|
entity |
| Predicate | alternateName |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kuna language |
E12670
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kuna language | Statement: [Guna language, alternateName, Kuna language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kuna language Context triple: [Guna language, alternateName, Kuna language]
-
A.
Kickapoo language
Kickapoo language is an endangered Central Algonquian language traditionally spoken by the Kickapoo people in parts of the United States and Mexico.
-
B.
Meskwaki language
The Meskwaki language is an Algonquian language traditionally spoken by the Meskwaki (Fox) people of the Great Lakes region in North America.
-
C.
Kuna
chosen
Kuna is an indigenous Chibchan language spoken by the Guna (Kuna) people primarily in Panama and parts of Colombia.
-
D.
Illiniwek language
The Illiniwek language is an Algonquian language historically spoken by the Illinois (Illiniwek) peoples of the central Mississippi River valley.
-
E.
Kaurna language
The Kaurna language is the traditional Indigenous Australian language of the Kaurna people of the Adelaide Plains in South Australia, currently undergoing revitalization after near extinction.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad859b54f881909bf530d549caf2fd |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb0110f1c8190ae60708b686cbbf9 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b2e8462a0c8190aba2330da6c49ecf |
completed | March 12, 2026, 4:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:10 p.m.