Triple
T32756139
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Imam Ahmad bin Yahya |
E837625
|
entity |
| Predicate | penultimateImamOf |
P175509
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Zaydi Imamate in Yemen |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Zaydi Imamate in Yemen | Statement: [Imam Ahmad bin Yahya, penultimateImamOf, Zaydi Imamate in Yemen]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: penultimateImamOf Context triple: [Imam Ahmad bin Yahya, penultimateImamOf, Zaydi Imamate in Yemen]
-
A.
finalImam
Indicates that an entity is the last or ultimate Imam in a recognized sequence of Imams.
-
B.
fifthImam
Indicates that the subject is recognized as the fifth Imam in a specified religious or historical succession.
-
C.
seventhImam
Indicates that the subject is recognized as the seventh Imam in a specific line of religious succession or leadership.
-
D.
eighthImam
Indicates that the subject is the eighth Imam in a recognized sequence of Imams within a given religious or doctrinal tradition.
-
E.
fourthImam
Indicates that the subject is recognized as the fourth Imam in a specific religious or historical succession.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34937f97c8190b7f84bea045df3ae |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d210fc80819091ed8961aa2cddfb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cfe45554819089cbbd538d992132 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6d16b79dc8190ab0d4657f2ef9a5b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:12 a.m.