Triple

T32740161
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject COMTRAN E837196 entity
Predicate hasInfluencedFeatureIn P152735 FINISHED
Object COBOL data division LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: COBOL data division | Statement: [COMTRAN, hasInfluencedFeatureIn, COBOL data division]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInfluencedFeatureIn
Context triple: [COMTRAN, hasInfluencedFeatureIn, COBOL data division]
  • A. hasPossibleInfluence
    Indicates that one entity may have an effect on, contribute to, or shape the state, behavior, or outcome of another entity, without asserting that this influence is definite or direct.
  • B. featuresInfluence
    Indicates that certain features or characteristics have an effect on or contribute to changes in other features, outcomes, or behaviors.
  • C. hasSubsequentInfluence
    Indicates that one entity has an influence or effect that occurs after, and is causally or temporally downstream from, another entity or event.
  • D. influencedIn chosen
    Indicates that one entity had an effect on or shaped another entity within a specific context, domain, or setting.
  • E. hasAdditionalInfluence
    Indicates that one entity exerts extra or supplementary influence on another entity beyond any primary or baseline effect.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34936e1748190b797e406e4e9293a completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffa5f31c8881908c26e2aa52df6ece completed May 9, 2026, 9:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffa42aee408190ad1a5f285688b338 completed May 9, 2026, 9:16 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:12 a.m.