Triple

T32738725
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hijaz scale E837160 entity
Predicate hasCharacteristicChordImplication P151764 FINISHED
Object dominant chord with flat ninth LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dominant chord with flat ninth | Statement: [Hijaz scale, hasCharacteristicChordImplication, dominant chord with flat ninth]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCharacteristicChordImplication
Context triple: [Hijaz scale, hasCharacteristicChordImplication, dominant chord with flat ninth]
  • A. usesChordChangesOf
    Indicates that one musical work employs the same or substantially similar chord progression as another work.
  • B. hasChordProgressionType
    Indicates that a musical piece, section, or passage exhibits a specific type or pattern of chord progression.
  • C. hasCharacteristic
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is defined by a particular attribute, feature, or quality.
  • D. isChromatic
    Indicates that something exhibits chromatic properties, such as involving or characterized by multiple colors or tones.
  • E. typicalChord chosen
    Indicates that a chord is a standard, commonly occurring, or characteristic instance within a given musical or harmonic context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34936e1748190b797e406e4e9293a completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fdec5ffe088190ac5505f26c6cff18 completed May 8, 2026, 2 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdeae15f1c81908fc63fbc1b028d2e completed May 8, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:12 a.m.