Triple
T32730417
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ibar River |
E836932
|
entity |
| Predicate | leftTributary |
P114978
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lepenac River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lepenac River | Statement: [Ibar River, leftTributary, Lepenac River]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: leftTributary Context triple: [Ibar River, leftTributary, Lepenac River]
-
A.
tributary
Indicates that one watercourse flows into and feeds another, contributing its water to a larger stream, river, or lake.
-
B.
tributarySide
chosen
Indicates the side (e.g., left or right bank) of a main watercourse on which a tributary joins it.
-
C.
locatedOnTributaryOf
Indicates that one entity is situated along or on the banks of a tributary that flows into another specified water body.
-
D.
upstreamRiver
Indicates that one river is located or flows in an upstream direction relative to another river within the same watercourse system.
-
E.
isMajorWatercourseOf
Indicates that a watercourse is a primary or significant river or stream associated with, or flowing through, a particular geographic area or feature.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34935fb048190ad4967420581f835 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c8cd5cd48190b4d44faed8fcce07 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6c3f717a88190a924d614c2c9bca3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:11 a.m.