Triple
T32730117
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Leclerc (licensed derivative) |
E836924
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUpgradePotential |
P106419
|
FINISHED |
| Object | electronics modernization |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: electronics modernization | Statement: [Leclerc (licensed derivative), hasUpgradePotential, electronics modernization]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUpgradePotential Context triple: [Leclerc (licensed derivative), hasUpgradePotential, electronics modernization]
-
A.
hasUpgrade
Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is associated with an improved or enhanced version of another entity.
-
B.
mayBeUpgradedTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity is eligible or allowed to be changed into a higher, improved, or more advanced version represented by another entity.
-
C.
canBePoweredUp
Indicates that an entity has the capability to receive additional power or energy, enhancing its state or functionality.
-
D.
hasUpgradeSystem
Indicates that an entity includes or is equipped with a system for performing upgrades or enhancements.
-
E.
hasUpgradeProject
Indicates that an entity is associated with a project whose purpose is to improve, enhance, or modernize that entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34935fb048190ad4967420581f835 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c8cbb9248190a13b712c81948822 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6c3f617c08190a70ba880210f908c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:11 a.m.