Triple
T32729363
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Finland |
E836905
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDefenseResponsibilityFor |
P45870
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Åland Islands |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Åland Islands | Statement: [Finland, hasDefenseResponsibilityFor, Åland Islands]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDefenseResponsibilityFor Context triple: [Finland, hasDefenseResponsibilityFor, Åland Islands]
-
A.
militaryResponsibility
chosen
Indicates that an entity holds authority, duty, or accountability for military actions, operations, or forces in relation to another entity.
-
B.
partOfDefenseLine
Indicates that one entity functions as a component or segment within the overall defensive formation or system of another entity.
-
C.
airDefenseResponsibility
Indicates that an entity has the duty or authority to protect a specified area, asset, or force against airborne threats.
-
D.
defenseOrganization
Indicates a relationship where an entity functions as an organization responsible for defense or military-related activities for another entity or jurisdiction.
-
E.
recognizesDefense
Indicates that one entity acknowledges, identifies, or accepts another entity’s defensive action, strategy, or legal defense as such.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34935fb048190ad4967420581f835 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69feb8e856d48190aa34ad8ee8376e1c |
completed | May 9, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69feb82a2b6c8190a473cc25976897be |
completed | May 9, 2026, 4:29 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:11 a.m.