Triple
T32720325
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Redstone 5 |
E836652
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsSecurityImprovements |
P201324
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Redstone 5, containsSecurityImprovements, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsSecurityImprovements Context triple: [Redstone 5, containsSecurityImprovements, true]
-
A.
securityChangesAfter
Indicates that the security status or configuration of one entity is modified as a consequence of a prior event or change in another entity.
-
B.
safetyChangesImplemented
Indicates that specific safety-related modifications or measures have been put into effect.
-
C.
hasSecurityConsideration
Indicates that there is a relevant security-related issue, risk, or precaution associated with the referenced entity.
-
D.
hasSecurityArchitecture
Indicates that an entity is associated with or defined by a particular security architecture design or framework.
-
E.
securityAdvisory
Indicates a relationship where an entity issues, references, or is associated with a warning or guidance about security vulnerabilities, risks, or protective measures.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34935455881909088975d79460418 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffebbd9bac8190b3dca4b7252a2278 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffe93120a08190a44bb64d052eda78 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ffebbcef80819099714fa9b7fda762 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:11 a.m.