Triple
T32714644
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gaunilo of Marmoutiers |
E836488
|
entity |
| Predicate | argumentTypeCritiqued |
P165808
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ontological argument |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ontological argument | Statement: [Gaunilo of Marmoutiers, argumentTypeCritiqued, ontological argument]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: argumentTypeCritiqued Context triple: [Gaunilo of Marmoutiers, argumentTypeCritiqued, ontological argument]
-
A.
typeOfCriticism
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of criticism directed at another entity or subject.
-
B.
argumentType
Indicates that one entity serves as a specific semantic or syntactic argument role (such as subject, object, or complement) in relation to another entity or event.
-
C.
aimsToCritique
Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
-
D.
criticizedConstruct
Indicates that one entity expressed disapproval or negative judgment about another entity’s constructed work, idea, or creation.
-
E.
criticismReason
Indicates that one entity criticizes another entity specifically because of the stated reason.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493446148190819541f3ffe79975 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6cd126fcc8190aa1f1f146e45ec0c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cc1470808190b70cdfd7a6395670 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:11 a.m.