Triple
T32714643
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gaunilo of Marmoutiers |
E836488
|
entity |
| Predicate | critiquedAuthor |
P56883
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Anselm of Canterbury |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Anselm of Canterbury | Statement: [Gaunilo of Marmoutiers, critiquedAuthor, Anselm of Canterbury]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: critiquedAuthor Context triple: [Gaunilo of Marmoutiers, critiquedAuthor, Anselm of Canterbury]
-
A.
literaryCritic
Indicates a relationship where one entity evaluates, analyzes, or interprets the literary works or writings of another entity.
-
B.
authorOfCriticalReception
Indicates that an entity is the author or creator of a critical review, evaluation, or reception of another work or subject.
-
C.
examinesAuthor
chosen
Indicates that one entity critically studies, analyzes, or evaluates the work, ideas, or contributions of an author.
-
D.
famousCritique
Indicates that one entity is a well-known critical assessment, review, or commentary about another entity.
-
E.
workAuthorIs
Indicates that a specific person or entity is the author or creator of a particular work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493446148190819541f3ffe79975 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d16f5cb881908eed141afaaa0b51 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cfe45554819089cbbd538d992132 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:11 a.m.