Triple

T32710054
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject EntityTransaction E836372 entity
Predicate rollback() semantics P12913 FINISHED
Object rolls back the current transaction LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rolls back the current transaction | Statement: [EntityTransaction, rollback() semantics, rolls back the current transaction]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rollback() semantics
Context triple: [EntityTransaction, rollback() semantics, rolls back the current transaction]
  • A. rollback()Throws
    Indicates that invoking the rollback() operation may result in an exception being thrown.
  • B. subsequentReversal
    Indicates that a previously made decision, action, or condition is later undone, overturned, or reversed in time.
  • C. canRevertTo
    Indicates that one state, version, or condition has the ability to be changed back or restored to another prior state, version, or condition.
  • D. reversibility chosen
    Indicates that a process, action, or transformation can be undone or reversed to restore the original state or conditions.
  • E. mayReverse
    Indicates that an action, process, or state can be undone or returned to a previous condition.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3493446148190819541f3ffe79975 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6cd126fcc8190aa1f1f146e45ec0c completed May 3, 2026, 4:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6cc1470808190b70cdfd7a6395670 completed May 3, 2026, 4:16 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:10 a.m.