Triple

T32710053
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject EntityTransaction E836372 entity
Predicate commit() semantics P175029 FINISHED
Object commits the current transaction LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: commits the current transaction | Statement: [EntityTransaction, commit() semantics, commits the current transaction]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commit() semantics
Context triple: [EntityTransaction, commit() semantics, commits the current transaction]
  • A. commit()Throws
    Indicates that invoking the commit() operation may result in an exception being thrown.
  • B. guaranteeCommitments
    Indicates a relationship where one party formally assures that specific obligations or promises made to another party will be fulfilled or upheld.
  • C. connectionSemantics
    Indicates the nature or rules of how entities are linked or related within a given context.
  • D. implementsCommitment
    Indicates that one party fulfills, carries out, or puts into effect a previously agreed-upon commitment or obligation to another party.
  • E. commitsTo
    Indicates that one entity makes a promise or formal obligation to carry out a specific action or uphold a particular course of behavior toward another entity or goal.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3493446148190819541f3ffe79975 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6cd9bae8c8190b528641499162a75 completed May 3, 2026, 4:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6cc1470808190b70cdfd7a6395670 completed May 3, 2026, 4:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6cd119cac8190a0b3ebe8b9c742c2 completed May 3, 2026, 4:20 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:10 a.m.