Triple
T32707086
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rabin cryptosystem |
E836301
|
entity |
| Predicate | provableEquivalence |
P6530
|
FINISHED |
| Object | breaking scheme is equivalent to factoring n |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: breaking scheme is equivalent to factoring n | Statement: [Rabin cryptosystem, provableEquivalence, breaking scheme is equivalent to factoring n]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: provableEquivalence Context triple: [Rabin cryptosystem, provableEquivalence, breaking scheme is equivalent to factoring n]
-
A.
provesTo
Indicates that one entity demonstrates or establishes the truth or validity of something to another entity.
-
B.
isEquiconsistentWith
Indicates that two formal theories or systems have the same consistency strength, such that if one is consistent then the other is also consistent, and if one is inconsistent then so is the other.
-
C.
independentlyProvedBy
Indicates that a statement or result is established by a proof that does not rely on or derive from another specified proof or source.
-
D.
equivalentTo
chosen
Indicates that two entities represent the same concept, value, or state, and can be treated as interchangeable in the given context.
-
E.
probabilityThresholdEquivalence
Indicates that two or more probability thresholds are considered equivalent in value or effect within a given context or system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493446148190819541f3ffe79975 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c851d2488190a93924bca6b167d1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6c3f617c08190a70ba880210f908c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:10 a.m.