Triple
T32696978
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Juror 2 |
E836035
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToJuror8 |
—
|
GENERATED |
| Object | persuaded by Juror 8’s reasonable doubt arguments |
—
|
UNRECOGNIZED GENERATED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToJuror8 Context triple: [Juror 2, relationshipToJuror8, persuaded by Juror 8’s reasonable doubt arguments]
-
A.
hasJuror
Indicates that a person or legal body is assigned or associated with a specific juror in a judicial context.
-
B.
jurorDescription
Indicates that a person is described as serving or having served in the role of a juror, often including details about their status or characteristics in that capacity.
-
C.
relationshipToJudges4
Indicates a specified type of relationship or connection that an entity has to a particular group or set of judges.
-
D.
jurorNumber
Indicates the specific numerical identifier assigned to a juror within a jury.
-
E.
jurorProfession
Indicates that an individual serves in the professional role or capacity of a juror in a legal proceeding.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493323288190a4e88251035fe96e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:10 a.m.