Triple
T32696975
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Juror 2 |
E836035
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsVerdict |
—
|
GENERATED |
| Object | guilty (initially) |
—
|
UNRECOGNIZED GENERATED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsVerdict Context triple: [Juror 2, supportsVerdict, guilty (initially)]
-
A.
supportsDecisionOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or agrees with the decision made by another entity.
-
B.
supportsConclusionOf
Indicates that one entity provides justification, evidence, or reasoning that backs up or helps establish the conclusion represented by another entity.
-
C.
supportsProsecutionIn
Indicates that an entity provides assistance or backing to the prosecution side within a specified legal case or jurisdiction.
-
D.
supportsOutcome
Indicates that one entity contributes to enabling, sustaining, or improving the achievement of a particular outcome associated with another entity.
-
E.
verdict
Indicates the formal decision or judgment reached and declared at the conclusion of a legal or evaluative process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493323288190a4e88251035fe96e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:10 a.m.