Triple

T32672308
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kosaki Onodera E835329 entity
Predicate hasChildhoodCrushOn P192977 FINISHED
Object Raku Ichijou NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Raku Ichijou | Statement: [Kosaki Onodera, hasChildhoodCrushOn, Raku Ichijou]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChildhoodCrushOn
Context triple: [Kosaki Onodera, hasChildhoodCrushOn, Raku Ichijou]
  • A. isChildhoodSweetheartOf
    Indicates that two people were romantically involved with each other during their childhood or adolescence, typically as first or early sweethearts.
  • B. hasFictionalRomanticInterest chosen
    Indicates that one entity is portrayed as having a romantic attraction or interest toward another entity within a fictional context.
  • C. formerRomanticInterest
    Indicates that one entity previously had a romantic relationship or attraction toward another entity, but that romantic connection has since ended.
  • D. loveInterestPortrayedBy
    Indicates that a character’s romantic interest is depicted or played by a particular actor or performer.
  • E. hasRomanticTensionWith
    Indicates a mutual or one-sided romantic attraction or unresolved romantic interest existing between two entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3493134b48190aa3c8cb523bd3800 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fde49a084081909d99b1e0258169d5 completed May 8, 2026, 1:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fde1d04bd881909a46ecbbf18dfe59 completed May 8, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:09 a.m.