Triple

T32670129
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gaunilo’s “On Behalf of the Fool” E835268 entity
Predicate preservedWith P189358 FINISHED
Object Anselm’s Proslogion NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Anselm’s Proslogion | Statement: [Gaunilo’s “On Behalf of the Fool”, preservedWith, Anselm’s Proslogion]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: preservedWith
Context triple: [Gaunilo’s “On Behalf of the Fool”, preservedWith, Anselm’s Proslogion]
  • A. preservedFor
    Indicates that something has been kept intact or maintained in a particular state for the benefit, use, or reference of a specified entity or purpose.
  • B. preservedFrom
    Indicates that something has been protected or kept safe from a particular source of damage, loss, or alteration.
  • C. preservedAt
    Indicates that something is kept, maintained, or conserved in a particular place or context.
  • D. somePreservedAs
    Indicates that at least one part or instance of an entity is kept or maintained in a particular state, form, or condition.
  • E. preservedExample
    Indicates that an example instance has been kept intact or maintained in its original state for future reference or use.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349303ccc8190a70d0f6e8a21d3fb completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbbc49da8c8190902bbb05d2477cab completed May 6, 2026, 10:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbb13f34b08190bbbb220ac1e6e666 completed May 6, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fbbc48b75c8190bec27dd4b7de797f completed May 6, 2026, 10:10 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:09 a.m.