Triple
T32670108
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gaunilo’s “On Behalf of the Fool” |
E835268
|
entity |
| Predicate | argumentativeStrategy |
P174785
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reductio ad absurdum |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reductio ad absurdum | Statement: [Gaunilo’s “On Behalf of the Fool”, argumentativeStrategy, reductio ad absurdum]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: argumentativeStrategy Context triple: [Gaunilo’s “On Behalf of the Fool”, argumentativeStrategy, reductio ad absurdum]
-
A.
argumentOf
Indicates that one entity functions as an argument (participant or operand) in relation to another entity, such as a predicate, event, or expression.
-
B.
arguesThat
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
-
C.
aimsToPersuade
Indicates an intentional effort by one entity to influence or change another entity’s beliefs, attitudes, or decisions.
-
D.
arguedWith
Indicates that one entity engaged in a verbal dispute or disagreement with another entity.
-
E.
arguesFrom
Indicates that one entity presents reasoning, evidence, or justification starting from another entity (such as a premise, assumption, or position) to support a conclusion or claim.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349303ccc8190a70d0f6e8a21d3fb |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c7e32ec08190b74856937c4a9fc3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6c3f617c08190a70ba880210f908c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6c77500a08190b2bdeca33bd2ac08 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:56 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:09 a.m.