Triple
T32664011
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eedson |
E835105
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableBearerConflict |
P203226
|
FINISHED |
| Object | World War II |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: World War II | Statement: [Eedson, hasNotableBearerConflict, World War II]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableBearerConflict Context triple: [Eedson, hasNotableBearerConflict, World War II]
-
A.
hasNotableBearer
Indicates that an entity (such as a name, title, or identifier) is borne by at least one notable person or entity.
-
B.
hasNotableBearerForm
Indicates that a particular form or variant of something is notably associated with a specific bearer or holder.
-
C.
hasNotableSingleBearer
Indicates that the relationship holds when a name, title, or identifier is notably associated with exactly one specific bearer, rather than shared among many.
-
D.
hasNotableBearersType
Indicates that an entity has notable bearers belonging to a specified type or category.
-
E.
hasNotableConflict
Indicates a significant, recognized dispute, clash, or opposition existing between the related entities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349303ccc8190a70d0f6e8a21d3fb |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a013e23698c81909a32d371b6f158d0 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a013db04b108190985897aa6e95b4ec |
completed | May 11, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a013e22bf3881909c8d7dc301966aa5 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:08 a.m.