Triple

T32624055
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jefferson Billings E834003 entity
Predicate targetOfAntagonists P196127 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Jefferson Billings, targetOfAntagonists, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: targetOfAntagonists
Context triple: [Jefferson Billings, targetOfAntagonists, yes]
  • A. antagonistOf
    Indicates a relationship where one entity actively opposes, conflicts with, or serves as an adversary to another.
  • B. primaryAntagonists
    Indicates that the referenced entities serve as the main opposing or adversarial forces in relation to a specified subject or narrative.
  • C. leadAntagonistCharacter
    Indicates that one character serves as the primary opposing or villainous force in relation to another entity in the narrative.
  • D. antagonistBaseOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary base, headquarters, or stronghold from which an antagonist operates or exerts influence over another entity.
  • E. hasAntagonisticProtagonist
    Indicates that the work features a main character who opposes or undermines the typical heroic or moral expectations of a traditional protagonist.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3492ccc80819086ef7d26e9786647 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe08d2b2e48190ac7be6d62d4a44a3 completed May 8, 2026, 4:01 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe06cd3af08190ae25de0dc0cdd573 completed May 8, 2026, 3:52 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe08d1b3f881908eccb74cb0d246dc completed May 8, 2026, 4:01 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:06 a.m.