Triple
T32616595
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LHPA |
E833800
|
entity |
| Predicate | belongsToAllianceInfrastructure |
P138399
|
FINISHED |
| Object | NATO |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: NATO | Statement: [LHPA, belongsToAllianceInfrastructure, NATO]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: belongsToAllianceInfrastructure Context triple: [LHPA, belongsToAllianceInfrastructure, NATO]
-
A.
allianceStructure
Indicates the organizational or relational configuration that defines how members of an alliance are structured and interconnected.
-
B.
infrastructureAssociatedWith
chosen
Indicates a relationship where a piece of infrastructure is functionally or contextually connected to, supports, or is used by another entity.
-
C.
allianceOrOwnership
Indicates a relationship where one entity either forms an alliance with or holds ownership over another entity.
-
D.
allianceType
Indicates the specific kind or category of alliance relationship that exists between entities.
-
E.
involvesAlliance
Indicates that there exists a cooperative or strategic alliance relationship between the referenced entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3492bfa648190b6ae472074634e29 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fedd5a5f4c8190acce88db56303703 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fed910b31c8190ae837163d146738d |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:49 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:06 a.m.