Triple
T32603542
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Itunyoso |
E833442
|
entity |
| Predicate | indigenousGroupLanguageStatus |
P13442
|
FINISHED |
| Object | endangered |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: endangered | Statement: [Itunyoso, indigenousGroupLanguageStatus, endangered]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: indigenousGroupLanguageStatus Context triple: [Itunyoso, indigenousGroupLanguageStatus, endangered]
-
A.
ethnicLanguageStatus
Indicates the status or role of a language in relation to a particular ethnic group (e.g., primary, secondary, heritage, or minority language).
-
B.
languageEndangermentStatus
chosen
Indicates the degree to which a language is at risk of falling out of use or becoming extinct.
-
C.
isIndigenousLanguageGroup
Indicates that a language group originates from and is traditionally associated with the native or first peoples of a specific region or territory.
-
D.
mainIndigenousLanguage
Indicates the primary indigenous language predominantly used or spoken by a person, group, or within a specific context.
-
E.
ethnicGroupLanguageOf
Indicates that a particular language is spoken by, associated with, or characteristic of a given ethnic group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3492ab63c8190aec24d5003b47c29 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c6c4b418819089ad5fb4d768a129 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6bd2c138481908afa3ee3e91f8900 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:05 a.m.