Triple
T32592361
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rancho Rosa Partnership |
E833104
|
entity |
| Predicate | creativeLead |
P68294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | David Lynch |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: David Lynch | Statement: [Rancho Rosa Partnership, creativeLead, David Lynch]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: creativeLead Context triple: [Rancho Rosa Partnership, creativeLead, David Lynch]
-
A.
designLead
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary designer or person in charge of leading the design work for another entity or project.
-
B.
creativeDirectionBy
chosen
Indicates that the creative direction or overall artistic vision for something is provided or led by a specified entity.
-
C.
creativeHubFor
Indicates that one entity serves as a central place or environment that fosters, supports, or concentrates the creative activities of another entity.
-
D.
creativeScope
Indicates the range or domain within which an entity is allowed or intended to exercise creativity or generate original content.
-
E.
creativeStrategy
Indicates a relationship where an entity develops or employs an overarching creative plan or approach to guide how ideas are expressed or executed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34929ff648190aded9424aa7564ae |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fed48d8e148190a99c0aea29f8a3ee |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fed3c82a24819095e614e31ac0307f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:27 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:05 a.m.