Triple
T32590807
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kirby Reed |
E833057
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusInScream4 |
P197775
|
FINISHED |
| Object | left for dead by Ghostface |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: left for dead by Ghostface | Statement: [Kirby Reed, statusInScream4, left for dead by Ghostface]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusInScream4 Context triple: [Kirby Reed, statusInScream4, left for dead by Ghostface]
-
A.
statusInSI
Indicates that an entity’s status or condition is specified according to the International System of Units (SI) or an SI-based standard.
-
B.
statusInSira
Indicates the status or standing that an entity holds within the Sira system or classification.
-
C.
statusIncludes
Indicates that one entity’s status set contains or encompasses the status (or statuses) of another entity.
-
D.
statusIndicates
Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
-
E.
statusInSystem7
Indicates that an entity holds a particular status or state within the context of system 7.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34929ff648190aded9424aa7564ae |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69feaa483fcc81909d8a46b38a8717bf |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fea8c9d45c81908ccc8619e5fefac1 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:23 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69feaa477f7c81909382b3aa77e7e11c |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:05 a.m.