Triple
T3254981
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Conservative government of the United Kingdom |
E68274
|
entity |
| Predicate | socialPolicyOrientation |
P4795
|
FINISHED |
| Object | traditional social values |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: traditional social values | Statement: [Conservative government of the United Kingdom, socialPolicyOrientation, traditional social values]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: socialPolicyOrientation Context triple: [Conservative government of the United Kingdom, socialPolicyOrientation, traditional social values]
-
A.
policyStance
chosen
Indicates the position or viewpoint an entity holds regarding a specific policy or set of policies.
-
B.
socialOrientation
Indicates the nature or direction of an entity’s social tendencies, such as how it typically relates to, interacts with, or aligns itself within social contexts or groups.
-
C.
policyApproach
Indicates the strategy, method, or overall course of action adopted in creating, implementing, or managing a policy.
-
D.
commonPolicyArea
Indicates that two entities share the same policy domain, topic, or area of regulatory or legislative focus.
-
E.
policyAlignment
Indicates the degree to which one entity’s policies are consistent with, supportive of, or in agreement with those of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad858f74408190bcbd07f967cd7bd0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adaf65c9388190a0d74d6365ce631e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada41ae74081909a0d1d696be8e35e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:09 p.m.