Triple

T3254948
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject India–United Kingdom relations E68273 entity
Predicate hasSecurityDimension P46890 FINISHED
Object defence cooperation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defence cooperation | Statement: [India–United Kingdom relations, hasSecurityDimension, defence cooperation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSecurityDimension
Context triple: [India–United Kingdom relations, hasSecurityDimension, defence cooperation]
  • A. hasSecurityNotion
    Indicates that one entity possesses, defines, or is associated with a particular concept or notion of security in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. hasSecurityPresence
    Indicates that some form of security personnel, system, or measures are present at or associated with an entity or location.
  • C. hasSecurityFunction
    Indicates that an entity performs, provides, or is responsible for a security-related role, protection mechanism, or safeguarding function for another entity or system.
  • D. hasSecurityArea
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, assigned to, or falls within a defined security-controlled area or zone.
  • E. hasSecurityArchitecture
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or defined by a particular security architecture design or framework.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad858f74408190bcbd07f967cd7bd0 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adaf65c9388190a0d74d6365ce631e completed March 8, 2026, 5:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ada41ae74081909a0d1d696be8e35e completed March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ada525bb2c8190b773efe6d696b6ab completed March 8, 2026, 4:34 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:09 p.m.