Triple

T32531304
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mixtecan E831461 entity
Predicate languageFamilyCodeType P6290 FINISHED
Object historical-comparative classification LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historical-comparative classification | Statement: [Mixtecan, languageFamilyCodeType, historical-comparative classification]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageFamilyCodeType
Context triple: [Mixtecan, languageFamilyCodeType, historical-comparative classification]
  • A. languageFamilyCode chosen
    Indicates the language family to which a given language belongs, represented by a standardized code.
  • B. languageFamily
    Indicates that two or more languages belong to the same genealogical language family or linguistic lineage.
  • C. languageFamilyOf
    Indicates that one entity is the language family to which the other entity (a specific language) belongs.
  • D. languageFamilyUsedFor
    Indicates that a particular language family is employed or utilized for a specific purpose, context, or function.
  • E. languageFamilyAssociation
    Indicates an association where one entity belongs to, is classified under, or is related to a particular language family.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34924b1cc8190ad3aca0c0f012a7e completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffe23081408190a121d901dbce1403 completed May 10, 2026, 1:41 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffe18aed348190912a5996b2da728b completed May 10, 2026, 1:38 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:01 a.m.