Triple

T32523200
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Minister van Justitie E831235 entity
Predicate hasPortfolioArea P12124 FINISHED
Object justice LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: justice | Statement: [Minister van Justitie, hasPortfolioArea, justice]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPortfolioArea
Context triple: [Minister van Justitie, hasPortfolioArea, justice]
  • A. hasVenuePortfolio
    Indicates that an entity maintains or owns a collection or portfolio of venues.
  • B. hasNotableCollectionArea
    Indicates that an entity possesses a significant or distinguished collection focused on a particular subject, theme, or domain.
  • C. portfolioOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the collection of investments, works, or assets that are owned, managed, or represented by another entity.
  • D. hasPortArea
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific port area, typically representing the spatial extent or boundary of its port facilities.
  • E. hasNotableLandmarkInPortfolio
    Indicates that an entity includes a specific notable landmark among the assets or properties it manages, owns, or represents in its portfolio.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34923e1548190be0524205d8cdf8f completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69feabcda59481908f2bc13b46fcced1 completed May 9, 2026, 3:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69feaabd63f88190b30dcf6dd2ea39d1 completed May 9, 2026, 3:32 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:01 a.m.