Triple
T32520517
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | FPS |
E831167
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusOfReferent |
P84060
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal administrative body |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal administrative body | Statement: [FPS, legalStatusOfReferent, federal administrative body]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusOfReferent Context triple: [FPS, legalStatusOfReferent, federal administrative body]
-
A.
legalStatusOfAuthority
chosen
Indicates the legal status or standing that a particular authority holds within a given legal or regulatory framework.
-
B.
legalStatusOfRepresentative
Indicates the legal standing, authority, or capacity in which a representative is formally recognized in relation to another party or action.
-
C.
legalStatusClarifiedBy
Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
-
D.
legalStatusAtIssue
Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the central subject of dispute, consideration, or determination in a legal context.
-
E.
legalStatusAffirmedIn
Indicates that an entity’s legal status has been formally confirmed or upheld within a specified legal jurisdiction, document, or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34923e1548190be0524205d8cdf8f |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fef2db323c8190821bda53f22a42be |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fef21d63c88190abf6a99b59b3c655 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:36 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1 a.m.