Triple
T32519639
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Anti-Abuse Working Group |
E831146
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RIPE community working group |
C57954
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: RIPE community working group Context triple: [Anti-Abuse Working Group, instanceOf, RIPE community working group]
-
A.
RIPE community working group
chosen
A RIPE community working group is a collaborative forum within the RIPE community where network operators, policymakers, and other stakeholders develop, discuss, and refine policies and best practices related to Internet number resources and operations in the RIPE region.
-
B.
IETF working group
An IETF working group is a collaborative, time-bounded team of experts chartered within the Internet Engineering Task Force to develop, discuss, and standardize specific Internet technologies or protocols.
-
C.
IRTF research group
An IRTF research group is a collaborative team within the Internet Research Task Force that investigates long-term, exploratory topics related to the evolution and future of Internet technologies.
-
D.
Internet governance community
The Internet governance community is a diverse, multi-stakeholder group of individuals and organizations that collaboratively develop, influence, and implement policies, standards, and practices shaping the global Internet’s operation and evolution.
-
E.
IETF area
An IETF area is a high-level organizational division within the Internet Engineering Task Force that groups related working groups and activities under a common technical or functional theme.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34923e1548190be0524205d8cdf8f |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1 a.m.