Triple
T32517591
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Blue Coat Systems |
E831099
|
entity |
| Predicate | parentCompanyAfter2016 |
P5441
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Symantec |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Symantec | Statement: [Blue Coat Systems, parentCompanyAfter2016, Symantec]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: parentCompanyAfter2016 Context triple: [Blue Coat Systems, parentCompanyAfter2016, Symantec]
-
A.
laterParentCompany
chosen
Indicates that one entity became the parent company of another entity at a later point in time, after some prior state or relationship.
-
B.
parentCompanyAfterRebranding
Indicates that one company serves as the parent company of another specifically after the latter has undergone a rebranding.
-
C.
parentCompanyAtTime
Indicates that one company is the parent (controlling) company of another during a specified time period.
-
D.
parentCompanyAfterMerger
Indicates that one company is the resulting parent company of another following a merger.
-
E.
formerParentCompany
Indicates that one entity previously served as the parent company of another but no longer holds that status.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3492318348190ba37fb6b5f1d67f4 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd19f791f48190bbb6f6047f9ddc59 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 11:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd0df365948190bc9bfc7ffd46acd8 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1 a.m.