Triple
T32516450
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Signal protocol Double Ratchet |
E831073
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | component of the Signal Protocol |
C53997
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: component of the Signal Protocol Context triple: [Signal protocol Double Ratchet, instanceOf, component of the Signal Protocol]
-
A.
cryptographic protocol component
chosen
A cryptographic protocol component is a modular element—such as a key exchange, authentication step, or encryption mechanism—that participates in a larger protocol to provide specific security properties like confidentiality, integrity, or authenticity.
-
B.
cryptographic protocol message
A cryptographic protocol message is a structured unit of data exchanged between parties in a cryptographic protocol, containing information such as identifiers, nonces, keys, and signatures to achieve security goals like confidentiality, integrity, and authentication.
-
C.
cryptographic protocol framework
A cryptographic protocol framework is a structured set of tools, abstractions, and rules that enables the design, specification, analysis, and implementation of secure communication protocols.
-
D.
cryptographic protocol
A cryptographic protocol is a precisely defined sequence of operations and message exchanges that uses cryptographic primitives to achieve security goals such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation between parties.
-
E.
QUIC protocol invariant
A QUIC protocol invariant is a fundamental property or rule of the QUIC transport protocol that must hold true across all compliant implementations and versions to ensure consistent, secure, and interoperable behavior.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3492318348190ba37fb6b5f1d67f4 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1 a.m.