Triple
T32498179
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Universal Composability framework |
E830582
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cryptographic security model |
C8212
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: cryptographic security model Context triple: [Universal Composability framework, instanceOf, cryptographic security model]
-
A.
cryptographic protocol
A cryptographic protocol is a precisely defined sequence of operations and message exchanges that uses cryptographic primitives to achieve security goals such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation between parties.
-
B.
cryptographic protocol framework
chosen
A cryptographic protocol framework is a structured set of tools, abstractions, and rules that enables the design, specification, analysis, and implementation of secure communication protocols.
-
C.
cryptographic protocol component
A cryptographic protocol component is a modular element—such as a key exchange, authentication step, or encryption mechanism—that participates in a larger protocol to provide specific security properties like confidentiality, integrity, or authenticity.
-
D.
cryptographic primitive
A cryptographic primitive is a low-level, well-defined algorithm or protocol (such as a hash function, block cipher, or digital signature scheme) that serves as a basic building block for constructing more complex cryptographic systems and protocols.
-
E.
cryptographic scheme family
A cryptographic scheme family is a parameterized collection of related cryptographic schemes (e.g., keyed by security parameter or algorithm variant) that share a common structure and security goals while differing in specific instantiations or parameters.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349219cb8819087e120f509629c1b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:59 a.m.