Triple

T3249446
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fécondité E68139 entity
Predicate hasIntendedEffect P46826 FINISHED
Object influence social policy debates on population LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: influence social policy debates on population | Statement: [Fécondité, hasIntendedEffect, influence social policy debates on population]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIntendedEffect
Context triple: [Fécondité, hasIntendedEffect, influence social policy debates on population]
  • A. hasConsequence
    Indicates that one event, action, or condition leads to or results in another as its outcome or effect.
  • B. hasLegalEffect
    Indicates that an action, document, or condition produces recognized legal consequences or enforceable rights and obligations.
  • C. hasCommonSideEffect
    Indicates that two or more treatments, drugs, or interventions share at least one side effect in common.
  • D. possibleSideEffect
    Indicates that one entity may occur as a side effect or unintended consequence of another entity or action.
  • E. intendedFunction
    Indicates that something is designed or purposed to perform a particular role, use, or function.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad858e4c708190aa31d486cfee8a6a completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adaf3fc3c8819080ac95974581ca0e completed March 8, 2026, 5:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ada41837e48190933572165be0ca38 completed March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ada525bb2c8190b773efe6d696b6ab completed March 8, 2026, 4:34 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:09 p.m.