Triple

T32485324
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Probie E830223 entity
Predicate hasRoleContext P161 FINISHED
Object junior field agent LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: junior field agent | Statement: [Probie, hasRoleContext, junior field agent]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRoleContext
Context triple: [Probie, hasRoleContext, junior field agent]
  • A. hasRole chosen
    Indicates that an entity occupies, performs, or is assigned a specific role or function in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. hasAdministrativeContext
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular administrative setting, scope, or jurisdiction that defines how it is governed, managed, or regulated.
  • C. hasAuthorContext
    Indicates that an entity is associated with contextual information about its author, such as background, circumstances, or metadata relevant to authorship.
  • D. hasProtectionContext
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific protection-related context that governs how it is safeguarded or controlled.
  • E. hasRankContext
    Indicates that an entity’s rank or ordering is defined, interpreted, or constrained within a specific contextual framework or situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34920aa4081908d8fb0277414b911 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd884cb2b48190b6acd473430d9e19 completed May 8, 2026, 6:53 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd8709ca208190a8bab836f0156af5 completed May 8, 2026, 6:47 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:58 a.m.