Triple

T32480265
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Istaevones E830087 entity
Predicate traditionalDivisionWith P197910 FINISHED
Object Ingaevones NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ingaevones | Statement: [Istaevones, traditionalDivisionWith, Ingaevones]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalDivisionWith
Context triple: [Istaevones, traditionalDivisionWith, Ingaevones]
  • A. traditionalDivisionStatus
    Indicates the status or condition of a relationship or grouping as defined by traditional or customary divisions.
  • B. parallelDivision
    Indicates that one entity is divided or partitioned in a way that runs parallel to the division or partitioning of another entity.
  • C. divisionAbove
    Indicates that one entity is positioned in a higher or superior division, tier, or level relative to another entity.
  • D. modernDivision
    Indicates that one entity is a contemporary or currently recognized administrative or organizational subdivision of another entity.
  • E. divisionContext
    Indicates the situational or conceptual setting in which a division operation or separation between entities takes place.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3491ff3b48190b50a7fa00bb05b1f completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69feb8e856d48190aa34ad8ee8376e1c completed May 9, 2026, 4:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69feb82a2b6c8190a473cc25976897be completed May 9, 2026, 4:29 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69feb8e6ed7881908446745c89c30784 completed May 9, 2026, 4:32 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:58 a.m.