Triple
T32479264
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 |
E830062
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPrecedentValueIn |
P3138
|
FINISHED |
| Object | subsequent maritime boundary disputes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subsequent maritime boundary disputes | Statement: [International Court of Justice ruling of 2014, hasPrecedentValueIn, subsequent maritime boundary disputes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPrecedentValueIn Context triple: [International Court of Justice ruling of 2014, hasPrecedentValueIn, subsequent maritime boundary disputes]
-
A.
hasPrecedingCondition
Indicates that one condition occurs or exists before another condition in time or sequence.
-
B.
hasCourtPrecedence
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
-
C.
precedentFor
chosen
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
-
D.
hasPrecedence
Indicates that one entity occurs, is considered, or is applied before another in order, priority, or importance.
-
E.
hasPrecedenceSystem
Indicates that one system is defined as having priority or a higher order of precedence over another system in determining outcomes or rules.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3491ff3b48190b50a7fa00bb05b1f |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00c8e617548190bba4cdfbb6f512e0 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00c7e816b88190bd40f5ea2a768c8b |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:01 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:58 a.m.