Triple

T32479258
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 E830062 entity
Predicate effectOnChile P188447 FINISHED
Object maintained sovereignty over key coastal waters adjacent to its coast LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: maintained sovereignty over key coastal waters adjacent to its coast | Statement: [International Court of Justice ruling of 2014, effectOnChile, maintained sovereignty over key coastal waters adjacent to its coast]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: effectOnChile
Context triple: [International Court of Justice ruling of 2014, effectOnChile, maintained sovereignty over key coastal waters adjacent to its coast]
  • A. effectOnSpain
    Indicates a relationship where one entity produces an influence, change, or consequence specifically affecting Spain.
  • B. effectOnUnitedStates
    Indicates the impact, influence, or consequences that something has on the United States.
  • C. effectOnCanada
    Indicates that one entity has an impact, influence, or consequence on Canada.
  • D. effectOnRussia
    Indicates the impact or consequences that something has on Russia.
  • E. impactOnSanctions
    Indicates the effect or influence that one action, event, or condition has on the imposition, severity, or modification of sanctions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3491ff3b48190b50a7fa00bb05b1f completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fba78aca4c8190b8f1831e8cc04e06 completed May 6, 2026, 8:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fba34a65a4819088bac6c17542d71c completed May 6, 2026, 8:23 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fba789c1188190973a919bfe2871f3 completed May 6, 2026, 8:41 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:58 a.m.