Triple
T32472174
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Special Clerical Court |
E829876
|
entity |
| Predicate | handlesOffenses |
P67290
|
FINISHED |
| Object | political offenses by clerics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: political offenses by clerics | Statement: [Special Clerical Court, handlesOffenses, political offenses by clerics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: handlesOffenses Context triple: [Special Clerical Court, handlesOffenses, political offenses by clerics]
-
A.
definesOffence
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the nature, elements, or scope of an offence associated with another entity.
-
B.
includesOffenseType
chosen
Indicates that one entity contains, specifies, or is associated with a particular category or type of offense.
-
C.
offenseAgainst
Indicates that one party has committed a harmful, illegal, or rule-violating act directed against another party or entity.
-
D.
supportsMultipleOffensesPerIncident
Indicates that a single incident can be associated with, or give rise to, more than one distinct offense.
-
E.
offenceCognizable
Indicates that the offence is of a type for which police may initiate investigation and arrest without requiring prior permission or a warrant from a magistrate.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3491ee87c81908cbf5890079c2af6 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f70e8755a48190931eaa77946f9460 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70abc00848190a1c3f495ef6c8dc6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:43 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:57 a.m.