Triple
T32462105
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Treviso FBC |
E829602
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPlayerPositionNotable |
P120654
|
FINISHED |
| Object | striker |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: striker | Statement: [Treviso FBC, hasPlayerPositionNotable, striker]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPlayerPositionNotable Context triple: [Treviso FBC, hasPlayerPositionNotable, striker]
-
A.
hasNotablePosition
Indicates that an entity holds or has held a position, role, or office considered notable or significant.
-
B.
positionOfNotablePlayer
chosen
Indicates the role or playing position that a notable player occupies within a team or sport.
-
C.
hasNotablePlayer
Indicates that an entity (such as a team or club) is associated with a player who is particularly distinguished, famous, or significant in its context.
-
D.
notablePlayerMovement
Indicates a significant change in a player's team, league, or competitive status within their sport or game.
-
E.
notablePositionCombination
Indicates that an entity holds or has held a particularly significant combination of positions, roles, or offices considered notable when taken together.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3491df9288190afc0b23b1d6e72ce |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcda3699948190adb57625bae08091 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcd8fd16d08190b0aca6e19a632e99 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:25 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:57 a.m.